Determination of calcium metabolism markers concentration in patients with calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis


DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/urology.2021.1.60-65

V.A. Porhanov, V.L. Medvedev, A.A. Budanov, A.N. Kurzanov, A.A. Basov

1) Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar, Russia; 2) Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital #1, Krasnodar, Russia
The aim of the research: to reveal the relationship of various markers of calcium metabolism (osteopontin (OPN), parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP), vitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH)) on the course of urolithiasis (Urolithiasis) in patients with calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis.
Materials and methods: 100 people were examined, the following groups were included: group 1 – patients with calcium oxalate primary nephrolithiasis (n=41), group 2 – with calcium oxalate recurrent nephrolithiasis (n=39). Group 3 included conditionally healthy volunteers (n=20). The studies were carried out by the immunoenzymometric ELIZA and biochemical methods using appropriate test systems.
Results: in patients with recurrent nephrolithiasis, the serum PTHrP level is 54.6 (25.4-78.2) pg / ml, which is 3.7 times higher than in conventionally healthy individuals; the level of osteopontin is more than 1.5 times higher and amounts to 1.820 (0.991-2.212) pg / ml. In the group of primary nephrolithiasis, the level of PTHrP is 2-2.5 times higher than in conventionally healthy people. In patients with primary nephrolithiasis, the blood calcium level does not correlate with the level of PTHrP in the blood (r=- 0.0173,
p> 0.05), as in the group with recurrent nephrolithiasis (r=0.0223, p>0.05).
Discussion: in patients with recurrent nephrolithiasis in the preoperative period, the serum levels of osteopontin and PTHrP in the blood serum were higher than in patients who were first diagnosed with urolithiasis, the data obtained can be used as a criterion for predicting the risk of recurrence of urolithiasis in the postoperative period. The blood calcium level does not have a statistically significant relationship with PTHrP, which allows us to assume that PTHrP has other mechanisms of influence on the development of urolithiasis, given the data obtained that the PTHrP level in patients with primary and recurrent nephrolithiasis is higher than in conditionally healthy people.
Conclusion: Determination of the level of PTHrP and osteopontin in patients with urolithiasis allows predicting the risk of recurrence of urolithiasis at the stage of primary calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Determination of the level of PTHrP makes it possible to predict the risks of developing urolithiasis in conventionally healthy individuals, which can be used for targeted prevention of an unfavorable course of urolithiasis by prescribing timely adequate rational therapy and correcting the patient’s diet. At the same time, no correlation was found between the level of PTHrP and the level of blood calcium in patients with calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis; therefore, further studies of the role of this protein in the pathogenesis of urolithiasis are needed.

About the Autors


Corresponding author: A.A. Budanov – Urologist of Urology Department, Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital #1, Postgraduate Student of Urology Department, Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar, Russia; e-mail: artembudanov2203@gmail.com


Similar Articles


Бионика Медиа