Русский
Oncological safety of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of histopathological outcomes and recurrence-free survival
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/urology.2020.2.60-64
E.A. Sokolov, E.I. Veliev, A.B Bogdanov, R.A. Veliev, D.A. Goncharuk
1 Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education (RMACPE), department of urology and surgical andrology, Moscow, Russia; 2 S.P. Botkin’s State Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia
Objective: To evaluate histopathological outcomes and biochemical recurrence (BCR) free survival in patients after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (nsRP).
Materials and methods: Prospective study group comprised 313 patients who underwent uni- or bilateral nsRP from 2014 to 2018; control group included 592 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent non-nsRP from 2014 to 2018. Mann-Whitney U-test was performed to assess continuous variables; chi-squared test was used for comparative analysis of categorical data. BCR free survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test was used to compare survival outcomes.
Results: Adverse histopathological findings were lower in the study group: extracapsular extension was found in 9,4% and 18,75% (p<0,001), grade group upgrade in 23% and 29,3% (p=0,04), positive surgical margins (PSM) in 15% and 22,1% (p=0,01). Subanalysis according to cancer risk groups showed lower PSM rates in high-risk patients (15,6% and 30,3%, p=0,017) and tendency for higher PSM rates in low-risk patients in the study group with no significant difference (12,6% and 7%, p=0,16). BCR free survival after 12 months was 100% and 88,2%, after 20 months – 92,3% and 86,4%, p=0,04. PSM ratesin the study group were notsignificantly different depending on the type of surgery: 13,9% in robotic-assisted approach and 15,4% in retropubic approach, p=0,75.
Conclusions: Relatively favorable histopathological outcomes and BCR free survival can be achieved after nsRP. However, obtained results could not be considered optimal and clearly indicate the need for further improvement of preoperative planning and intraoperative quality control of surgical treatment.
Materials and methods: Prospective study group comprised 313 patients who underwent uni- or bilateral nsRP from 2014 to 2018; control group included 592 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent non-nsRP from 2014 to 2018. Mann-Whitney U-test was performed to assess continuous variables; chi-squared test was used for comparative analysis of categorical data. BCR free survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test was used to compare survival outcomes.
Results: Adverse histopathological findings were lower in the study group: extracapsular extension was found in 9,4% and 18,75% (p<0,001), grade group upgrade in 23% and 29,3% (p=0,04), positive surgical margins (PSM) in 15% and 22,1% (p=0,01). Subanalysis according to cancer risk groups showed lower PSM rates in high-risk patients (15,6% and 30,3%, p=0,017) and tendency for higher PSM rates in low-risk patients in the study group with no significant difference (12,6% and 7%, p=0,16). BCR free survival after 12 months was 100% and 88,2%, after 20 months – 92,3% and 86,4%, p=0,04. PSM ratesin the study group were notsignificantly different depending on the type of surgery: 13,9% in robotic-assisted approach and 15,4% in retropubic approach, p=0,75.
Conclusions: Relatively favorable histopathological outcomes and BCR free survival can be achieved after nsRP. However, obtained results could not be considered optimal and clearly indicate the need for further improvement of preoperative planning and intraoperative quality control of surgical treatment.
About the Autors
Corresponding author: E.A. Sokolov – PhD in Medical Sciences, assistant, department of urology and surgical andrology (RMACPE), urologist at the S.P. Botkin’s State Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia; e-mail: sokolov.yegor@yandex.ru
Similar Articles
