DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/urology.2023.3.107-113
Б.Г. Гулиев, Ж.П. Авазханов
Центр урологии с робот-ассистированной хирургией Мариинской больницы (глав. врач – проф. А. А.Завражнов), Санкт-Петербург, Россия
1. Korneyev I., Ilyin D., Schultheiss D., Chapple C. The first oral mucosal graft urethroplasty was carried out in the 19th century: the pioneering experience of Kirill Sapezhko (1857–1928). Eur Urol. 2012;62 (4):624–627. Doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.035. 2. Humby G., Higgins T. A one-stage operation for hypospadias. Br J Surg. 1941;29:84–92. Doi: 10.1002/bjs.18002911312. 3. Bhargava S., Chapple C.R. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: is it the new gold standard? BJU Int. 2004;93:1191–1193. Doi: 10.1111/j.1464- 410X.2003.04860.x. 4. Lumen N., Vierstraete-Verlinde S., Oosterlinck W., et al. Buccal versus lingual mucosa graft in anterior urethroplasty: a prospective comparison of surgical outcome and donor site morbidity. J Urol. 2016;195(1):112–117. Doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.098. 5. Gn M., Sterling J., Sinkin J., et al. The expanding use of buccal mucosal grafts in urologic surgery. Urology. 2021;156:e58–e65. Doi: 10.1016/j.uology.2021.05.039. 6. Wessells H., Angermeier K.W, Elliott S., et al. Male urethral stricture: American urological association guideline. J Urol. 2017;197(1):182–190. Doi: 10.1016/ j.juro.2016.07.087. 7. Markiewicz M.R., De Santis J.L., Margarone J.E., et al. Morbidity associated with oral mucosa harvest for urological reconstruction: an overview. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:739–744. Doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.11.023. 8. Somerville J.J., Naude J.H. Segmental ureteric replacement: an animal study using a free non-pedicled graft. Urol Res. 1984;12(2):115–119. Doi: 10.1007/bf00257176. 9. Naude J.H. Buccal mucosal grafts in the treatment of ureteric lesions. BJU Int. 1999;83:751–754. Doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00019.x. 10. Kroepfl D., Loewen H., Klevecka V., Musch M. Treatment of long ureteric strictures with buccal mucosal grafts. BJU Int. 2010;105(10):1452–1455. Doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08994.x. 11. Badawy A.A., Abolyosr A., Saleem M.D., Abuzeid A.M. Buccal mucosa graft for ureteral stricture substitution: initial experience. Urology. 2010;76(4):971–975. Doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.095. 12. Trapeznikova M.F., Bazaev V.V., Shibaev A.N., et al. Replacement plastic surgery of extended ureteral strictures with an autograft of buccal mucosa. Urologiia. 2014;2:16–19. Russian (Трапезникова М.Ф., Базаев В.В., Шибаев А.Н., и соавт. Заместительная пластика протяженных стриктур мочеточника аутотрансплантатом буккальной слизистой. Урология. 2014;2:16–19). 13. Fahmy O., Schubert T., Khairul-Asri M.G., et al. Total proximal ureter substitution using buccal mucosa. Int. J Urol. 2017;24(4):320–23. Doi: 10.1111/iju.13307. 14. Volkov A.A., Zuban O.N., Budnik N.V., Saenko G.I. Surgical treatment of extended strictures and obliterations of the ureter using graft of the oral mucosa – own experience. Experimental and clinical urology. 2020;3:124–131. Russian (Волков А.А., Зубань О.Н., Будник Н.В., Саенко Г.И. Хирургическое лечение протяженных стриктур и облитераций мочеточника с использованием графта слизистой ротовой полости – собственный опыт. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2020;3:124–131). Doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2020-12-3-124-131. 15. Zhao L.C., Yamaguchi Y., Bryk D.J., et al. Robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction using buccal mucosa. Urology. 2015;86(3):634–638. Doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.006. 16. Li B., Xu Y., Hai B., et al. Laparoscopic onlay lingual mucosal graft ureteroplasty for proximal ureteral stricture: initial experience and 9-month follow-up. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2016;48(8):1275–1279. Doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1289-9. 17. Arora S., Campbell L., Tourojman M., et al. Robotic buccal mucosal graft ureteroplasty for complex ureteral stricture. Urology. 2017;110:257–258. Doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.06.037. 18. Lee Z., Waldorf B.T., Cho E.Y., et al. Robotic ureteroplasty with buccal mucosa graft for the management of complex ureteral strictures. J. Urol. 2017;198(6):1430–1435. Doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.097. 19. Гулиев Б.Г., Комяков Б.К., Авазханов Ж.П. Лапароскопическая буккальная пластика проксимального отдела мочеточника. Урология. 2021;3:13–19. Doi: 10.18565/urology.2021.3.13-19. 20. Volkov A.A., Budnik N.V., Zuban O.N. Laparoscopic onlay-ureteroplasty with buccal graft with prolonged recurrent stricture of the upper third of the ureter. Urology. 2021;5:69–72. Russian (Волков А.А., Будник Н.В., Зубань О.Н. Лапароскопическая onlay-уретеропластика буккальным графтом при протяженной рецидивной стриктуре верхней трети мочеточника. Урология. 2021;5:69–72). Doi: 10.18565/urology.2021.5.69-72. 21. Cheng S., Fan S., Wang L., et al. Laparoscopic and robotic ureteroplasty using onlay flap or graft for the management of long proximal or middle ureteral strictures: our experience and strategy. Int Urol. Nephrol. 2021;53(3):479–488. Doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02679-5. 22. Lee Z., Lee M., Koster H., Cheng N. Collaborative of reconstructive robotic ureteral surgery. A multi-institutional experience with robotic ureteroplasty with buccal mucosa graft: an updated analysis of intermediate-term outcomes. Urology. 2021;147:306–310. Doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.003. 23. Guliyev B.G., Ilyin D.M., Avazkhanov Zh.P. Robot-assisted buccal plasty of extended recurrent stricture of the pyelureteral segment of the left kidney. Urology Herald. 2021;9(4):122–126. Russian (Гулиев Б.Г., Ильин Д.М., Авазханов Ж.П. Робот-ассистированная буккальная пластика протяженной рецидивной стриктуры пиелуретерального сегмента левой почки. Вестник урологии. 2021;9(4):122–126). Doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-4-122-126. 24. Lee Z., Lee M., Koster H., et al. A multi-institutional experience with robotic ureteroplasty with buccal mucosa graft: an updated analysis of intermediate-term outcomes. Urology. 2021;147:306–310. Doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.003. 25. Moncrief T., Gor R., Goldfarb R.A., et al. Urethral rest with suprapubic cystostomy for obliterative or nearly obliterative urethral strictures: urethrographic changes and implications for management. J Urol. 2018;199:(5):1289–1295. Doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.110. 26. Lee Z., Lee M., Lee R., et al. Ureteral rest is associated with improved outcomes in patients undergoing robotic ureteral reconstruction of proximal and middle ureteral strictures. Urology. 2021;152:160–166. Doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.01.058. 27. Gupta D.K., Chandrasekharam V.V., Srinivas M., Bajpai M. Percutaneous nephrostomy in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction and poor renal function. Urology. 2001;57(3):547–550. Doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)01046-3. 28. Zhang S., Zhang Q., Ji C., et al. Improved split renal function after percutaneous nephrostomy in young adults with severe hydronephrosis due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2015;193(1):191–195. Doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.005. 29. Heijkoop B., Kahokehr A.A. Buccal mucosal ureteroplasty for the management of ureteric strictures: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Urol. 2021;28:189–195. Doi: 10.1111/iju.14426. 30. Zhao L.C., Weinberg A.C., Lee Z., et al. Robotic ureteral reconstruction using buccal mucosa grafts: a multi-institutional experience. Eur Urol. 2018;73(3):419–426. Doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.015. 31. Duty B.D., Kreshover J.E., Richstone L., Kavoussi L.R. Review of appendiceal onlay flap in the management of complex ureteric strictures in six patients. BJU Int. 2015;115(2):282–287. Doi: 10.1111/bju.12651. 32. Komyakov B., Ochelenko V., Guliev B., Shevnin M. Ureteral substitution with appendix. Int. J Urol. 2020;27(8):663–669. Doi: 10.1111/iju.14268. 33. Jun M.S., Stair S., Xu A., et al. A multi-institutional experience with robotic appendiceal ureteroplasty. Urology. 2020;145:287–291. Doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.062. 34. Wang J., Li Z., Fan S., et al. Robotic ureteroplasty with appendiceal onlay flap: an update on the outcomes of 18-month follow-up. Transl. Androl. Urol. 2022;11(1):2 –9. Doi: 10.21037/tau-21-840. 35. Komyakov B.K., Al-Attar T.H., Guliyev B.G. Intestinal and appendicular plastic surgery of the ureter. Urology. 2021;2:14–20. Russian (Комяков Б.К., Аль-Аттар Т.Х., Гулиев Б.Г. Кишечная и аппендикулярная пластика мочеточника. Урология. 2021;2:14–20). Doi: 10.18565/urology.2021.2.14-20. 36. Martov A.G., Ergakov D.V., Andronov A.S., Dutov S.V. Minimally invasive treatment of upper urinary tract strictures. Surgery. 2014;12:46–55. Russian (Maртов А.Г., Ергаков Д.В., Андронов А.С., Дутов С.В. Минимально инвазивное лечение стриктур верхних мочевых путей. Хирургия. 2014;12:46–55). 37. Lucas J.W., Ghiraldi E., Ellis J., Friedlander J.I. Endoscopic management of ureteral strictures: an update. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19:24. Doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0773-4. 38. Masieri L., Sforza S., Di Maida F., et al. Robotic correction of iatrogenic ureteral stricture: preliminary experience from a tertiary referral centre. Scand J Urol. 2019;53(5):356–360. Doi: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1651390. 39. Elbers J.R., Rodríguez Socarrás M., Rivas J.G., et al. Robotic repair of ureteral strictures: techniques and review. Curr Urol Rep. 2021;22(8):39. Doi: 10.1007/s11934-021-01056-8. 40. Mauck R.J., Hudak S.J., Terlecki R.P., Morey A.F. Central role of Boari bladder flap and downward nephropexy in upper ureteral reconstruction. J Urol. 2011;186(4):1345–1349. Doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.086. 41. Hofer M.D., Aguilar-Cruz H.J., Singla N., et al. Expanding applications of renal mobilization and downward nephropexy in ureteral reconstruction. Urology. 2016;94:232–236. Doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.04.008. 42. Kozinn S.I., Canes D., Sorcini A., Moinzadeh A. Robotic versus open distal ureteral reconstruction and reimplantation for benign stricture disease. J Endourol. 2012;26(2):147–151. Doi:10.1089/end.2011.0234. 43. Lee Z., Llukani E., Reilly C.E., et al. Single surgeon experience with robot-assisted ureteroureterostomy for pathologies at the proximal, middle, and distal ureter in adults. J Endourol. 2013;27:994–999. Doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0075. 44. Bao J.S., He Q., Li Y., et al. Yang-Monti principle in bridging long ureteral defects: cases report and a systematic review. Urol. J. 2017;14(4):4055– 4061. PMID: 28670676. 45. Liu D., Zhou H., Hao X., et al. Laparoscopic Yang-Monti ureteral reconstruction in children. Urology. 2018;118:177–182. Doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.04.034. 46. Komyakov B.K. Intestinal and appendicular plastic surgery of ureters. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2015. 416 p. Russian (Комяков Б.К. Кишечная и аппендикулярная пластика мочеточников. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2015. 416 с.). 47. Dein B., Hefnawy A.S., D’Elia G., et al. Long-term outcome of Yang-Monti ileal replacement of the ureter: a technique suitable for mild, moderate loss of kidney function and solitary kidney. Urology. 2021;152:153–159. Doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.061. 48. Patil N.N., Mottrie A., Sundaram B. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with psoas hitch: a multi-institutional, multinational evaluation. Urology. 2008;72:47–50. Doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.097. 49. Elsamra S.E., Theckumparampil N., Garden B., et al. Open, laparoscopic, and robotic ureteroneocystotomy for benign and malignant ureteral lesions: a comparison of over 100 minimally invasive cases. J Endourol. 2014;28:1455–1459. Doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0243. 50. White C., Stifelman M. Ureteral reimplantation, psoas hitch and Boari flap. J Endourol. 2020;34(S1):S25–S30. Doi: 10.1098/end.2018.0750. 51. Kogan M.I., Pavlov V.N., Belousov I.I. et al. Comparative analysis of the effectiveness and safety of open and laparoscopic techniques of distal ureter plastic surgery by Boari. Urologia. 2020;6:75–80. Russian (Коган М.И., Павлов В.Н., Белоусов И.И. и соавт. Сравнительный анализ эффективности и безопасности открытой и лапароскопической техники пластики дистального мочеточника по Боари. Урология. 2020;6:75–80). Doi:10.18565/urology.2020.6.75-80. 52. Zhang G., Zhao J., Zhao G., et al. Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with a Boari flap for long-segment ureteric avulsion or ureteric strictures: our experience. Int Urol. Nephrol. 2022;8:1865–1870. Doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03224-2. 53. Wolff B., Chartier-Kastler E., Mozer P., et al. Long-term functional outcomes after ileal ureter substitution: a single-center experience. Urology. 2011;78:692–95. Doi:10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.054. 54. Roth J.D., Monn M.F., Szymanski K.M., et al. Ureteral reconstruction with ileum: long-term follow-up of renal function. Urology. 2017;104:225–229. Doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.02.026. 55. Xiong S., Zhu W., Li X., et al. Intestinal interposition for complex ureteral reconstruction: a comprehensive review. Int J Urol. 2020;27:377–386. Doi: 10.1111/iju.14222. 56. Launer B.M., Redger K.D., Koslov D.S. et al. Long-term follow up of ileal ureteral replacement for complex ureteral strictures: single institution study. Urology. 2021;157:257–262. Doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.07.012. 57. Komyakov B.K., Guliyev B.G. Surgery of extended ureteral constrictions. St. Petersburg, Nevsky dialect. 2005;256 p. Russian (Комяков Б.К., Гулиев Б.Г. Хирургия протяженных сужений мочеточников. СПб., Невский диалект. 2005;256). 58. Pham N.H., Visser W.R., Phan-Huu Q.V., Hampton L.J. Renal autotransplantation for the treatment of complete ureteral loss: a case report. Res Rep Urol. 2021;28:733–737. Doi: 10.2147/RRU.S328832. 59. Kurmanov T., Zhanbyrbekuly U., Zheksen E. Autotransplantation of the kidney as a method of treatment of ureteral defects. Urologia. 2022;4:82–85. Russian (Курманов Т., Жанбырбекулы У., Жексен Е. Аутотрансплантация почки как метод лечения дефектов мочеточника. Урология. 2022;4:82–85). Doi: 10.18565/urology.2022.4.82-85. 60. Lee Z., Keehn A.Y., Sterling M.E., et al. A review of buccal mucosa graft ureteroplasty. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19(4):23. Doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0772-5. 61. Bjurlin M.A., Gan M., McClintock T.R. et al. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging: emerging applications in robotic upper urinary tract surgery. Eur Urol. 2014;65(4):793–801. Doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.023. 62. Lee Z., Moore B., Giusto L., Eun D.D. Use of indocyanine green during robot-assisted ureteral reconstructions. Eur Urol. 2015;67(2):291–298. Doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.057. 63. Martini A., Villari D., Nicita G. Long-term complications arising from bowel interposition in the urinary tract. Int J Surg. 2017;44:278–280. Doi: 10.1016/ j.ijsu.2017.07.030. 64. Pamecha Y., Shelke U., Patil B., et al. Use of ileum for complex ureteric reconstruction: assessment of long-term outcome, complications, and impact on renal function. Urol Ann. 2018;10:369–374. Doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_5_18.
А в т о р д л я с в я з и: Б. Г. Гулиев – д.м.н., профессор, Центр урологии с робот-ассистированной хирургией Мариинской больницы (глав. врач – проф. А. А. Завражнов), Санкт-Петербург, Россия; e-mail: gulievbg@mail.ru