DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/urology.2020.4.151-156
З.А. Кадыров, А.Ю. Одилов
Кафедра эндоскопической урологии факультета непрерывного медицинского образования медицинского института ФГАОУ ВО «Российский университет дружбы народов», Москва, Россия
1. Angus Chin On Luk, Pandian Rajadoss Muthu, Heer Rakesh. Laparoscopic renal surgery is here to stay. Arab Journal of Urology. 2018;16(3):314–320. 2. Erkan ÖLÇÜCÜOĞLU. Comparing the complications of laparoscopically performed simple, radical and donor nephrectomy. Turk J Med Sci. 2020;50:922–929. Doi:10.3906/sag-1910-120. 3. Kadyrov Z.A. Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoskopic operations in urology. M.: HЭOTAR-Medya. 2017; 488 p. 4. Lyul’ko A.V., Myagkij V.M. Errors and dangers in nephrectomy. Klinicheskaya hirurgiya. 1979;12:36–37. Russian (Люлько А.В., Мягкий В.М. Ошибки и опасности при нефрэктомии. Клиническая хирургия. 1979;12:36–37). 5. Pavlovskaya Z.A., Kapsargin F.P., Bavlovskij S.V., Alekseeva E.A., Zueva L.F.Difficulties in diagnosing, treating and preventing the development of persistent purulent fistula after emergency nephrectomy (clinical case). Materials of the V Congress of Siberian Urologists with international participation. Krasnoyarsk, Russia. 2016. S. 309–317. Russian (Павловская З.А., Капсаргин Ф.П., Бавловский С.В., Алексеева Е.А.,Зуева Л.Ф. Трудности диагностики, лечения и профилактики развития персистирующего гнойного свища после экстренной нефрэктомии (клинический случай). Материалы V конгресса урологов Сибири с международным участием. Красноярск, Россия. 2016; С. 309–317). 6. Ritchey M.L., Kelalis P.P., Breslow N., Etzioni R., Evans I., Haase G.M. et al. Surgical complications after nephrectomy for Wilms’ tumor. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1992;175(6):507–514. 7. Hovari L.F. Immediate results of surgical treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya. 2011;11:269–371. Russian (Ховари Л.Ф. Непосредственные результаты хирургического лечения больных почечно-клеточном раком. Фундаментальные исследования. 2011;11:269–371). 8. Montes S.F., Rodríguez I.G., Ugarteburu R.G., Villamil L.R., Mendez B.D., Gil P.S. et al. Intraoperative laparoscopic complications for urological cancer procedures. World J. Clin. Cases. 2015;16(5):450–456. 9. Catarci M., Carlini M., Gentileschi P., Santoro E. Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum. A multicenter study on 12,919 cases. Surg. Endosc. 2001;15:566–569. 10. Matsuda Т., Arai Y., Muguruma K., Mikami O., Komatsu Y., Terachi T. et al. Complications in urological laparoscopic surgery. Hinyokika Kiyo. 1993;39(4):337–343. 11. Azevedo J.L., Azevedo O.C., Miyahira S.A., Miguel G.P., Becker O.M.Jr., Hypólito O.H. et al. Injuries caused by Veress needle insertion for creation of pneumoperitoneum: a systematic literature review. Surg. Endosc. 2009;23(7):14280–1432. 12. Simon S.D., Castle E.P., Ferrigni R.G., Lamm D.L., Swanson S.K., Novicki D.E.et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy: the Mayo clinic experience. J. Urol. 2004;171(4):1447–1450. 13. Frank M.A., Sanzharov A.E., Myroshnychenko V.Y., Shamuratov R.Sh., Murzyn M.O., Kapustyn K.Y. y dr. Laparoscopic operations in urology and their complications. Ural»skyj medycynskyj zhurnal. 2017;146(02):96–99. Russian (Франк М.А., Санжаров А.Е., Мирошниченко В.И.,Шамуратов Р.Ш., Мурзин М.О., Капустин К.И. и др. Лапароскопические операции в урологии и их осложнения. Уральский медицинский журнал. 2017;146(02):96–99). 14. Eskicorapci S.Y., Teber D., Schulze M., Ates M., Stock C., Rassweiler J.J.Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the new gold standard surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma. Scientific World Journal. 2007;9(7):825–836. 15. Kruglov E.A., Narkevich A.I., Babich A.I., Pobedinceva Yu.A., Kudlachev V.A.,Filimonov E.V. i dr. Damage to the superior mesenteric artery during radical nephrectomy with laparoscopic access. Issledovaniya i praktika v medicine. 2018;5(3):136–141). Russian (Круглов Е.А., Наркевич А.И., Бабич А.И., Побединцева Ю.А., Кудлачев В.А., Филимонов Е.В. и др. Повреждение верхней брыжеечной артерии при радикальной нефрэктомии лапароскопическим доступом. Исследования и практика в медицине. 2018;5(3):136–141). 16. Permpongkosol S., Link R.E., Su L.M., Romero F.R., Bagga H.S., Pavlovich C.P. et al. Complications of 2,775 urological laparoscopic procedures: 1993 to 2005. J. Urol. 2007;177:580–585. 17. Siqueira T.M., Kuo R.L., Gardner T.A., Paterson R.F., Stevens L.H., Lingeman J.E. et al. Major complications in 213 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases: the Indianapolis experience. J. Urol. 2002;168(4 Pt 1):1361–1365. 18. Schwartz M.J., Faiena I., Cinman N., Kucharczyk J., Meriggi J.S., Waingankar N. et al. Laparoscopic bowel injury in retroperitoneal surgery: current incidence and outcomes. J. Urol. 2010;184(2):589–594. 19. Hsi R.S., Saint-Elie D.T., Zimmerman G.J., Baldwin D.D. Mechanisms of hemostatic failure during laparoscopic nephrectomy: review of Food and Drug Administration database. Urology. 2007;70(5):888–892. 20. Aron M., Colombo J.R., Turna B., Stein R.J., Haber G.P., Gill I.S. Diaphragmatic repair and/or reconstruction during upper abdominal urological laparoscopy. J Urol. 2007;178:2444–2450. 21. Del Pizzo J.J., Jacobs S.C., Bishoff J.T., Kavoussi L.R., Jarrett T.W. Pleural injury during laparoscopic renal surgery: early recognition and management. J Urol. 2003;169(1):41–44. 22. Yamamoto M., Minikel L., Zaritsky E. Laparoscopic 5-mm trocar site herniation and literature review. JSLS. 2011;15(1):122–126. 23. Moran D.C., Kavanagh D.O., Sahebally S., Neary P.C. Incidence of early symptomatic port-site hernia: a case series from a department where laparoscopy is the preferred surgical approach. Irish J. Med. Science. 2012;181(4):463–466. 24. Dulskas A., Luneviсius R., Stanaitis J. A case report of incisional hernia through a 5 mm lateral port site following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J. Minim. Access. Surg. 2011;7(3):187–189. 25. Khurshid N., Chung M., Horrigan T., Manahan K., Geisler J.P. 5-Millimeter Trocar-Site Bowel Herniation Following Laparoscopic Surgery. JSLS. 2012;16(2):306–310. 26. Williamson A., Paterson S., Erolin C., Sweeney C., Townell N., Nabi G. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for adult polycystic kidney disease: safety, feasibility, and early outcomes. J. Endourol. 2014;28(11):1268–1277. 27. Choi S.W., Kim K.S., Kim S., Choi Y.S., Bae W.J., Hong S.H. et al. Hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a matched-cohort comparison over 10 yr at a single institute. Clin. Transplant. 2014;28(11):1287–1293. 28. Ahearn A.J., Posselt A.M., Kang S.M., Roberts J.P., Freise C.E. Experience with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy among more than 1000 cases: low complication rates, despite more challenging cases. Arch. Surg. 2011;146(7):859–864. 29. Hanif F., Clancy M.J. Hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: initial Glasgow experience. Scott. Med. J. 2013;58(4):237–240. 30. Rajab A., Pelletier R.P. The safety of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: the Ohio State University experience with 1500 cases. Clin. Transplant. 2015;29(3)204–210. 31. Hot»e S.V., Mojsyuk Ya.H., Lucevych O.Э., Hallyamov Э.A., Efymkyn A.S.,Kornylov M.N. y dr. The comparative analysis of results of the donor nefrektomiya executed opened and various modifications of laparoscopic access.Vestnyk transplantolohyy y yskusstvennыx orhanov. 2011;13(1):6–16. Russian (Готье С.В., Мойсюк Я.Г., Луцевич О.Э., Галлямов Э.А.,Ефимкин А.С., Корнилов М.Н. и др. Сравнительный анализ результатов донорской нефрэктомии, выполненной открытым и различными модификациями лапароскопического доступа. Вестник трансплантологии и искусственных органов. 2011;13(1):6–16). 32. Stamatakis L., Mercado M.A., Choi J.M., Sanchez E.J., Gaber A.O., Knight R.J. et al. Comparison of laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) and conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at a single institution. BJU Int. 2013;112(2):198–206. 33. Dols L.F., Kok N.F., Ijzermans J.N. Live donor nephrectomy: a review of evidence for surgical techniques. Transpl. Int. 2010;23(2)121–127. 34. Halgrimson W.R., Halgrimson W.R., Campsen J., Mandell M.S., Kelly M.A., Kam I., Zimmerman M.A. Donor complications following laparoscopic compared to hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy: an analysis of the literature. J. Transplant. 2010;(4):825689 35. Nykodymova S., Urge T., Dolejsova O., Stransky P., Travnicek I., Prochazkova K. et al. Our experience with laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) nephrectomy in clinical practice. Eur. Urol. Suppl. 2017;16(11):e2927. 36. Zhu X., Yang X., Hu X., Zhang X. Retroperitoneoscopic versus open surgical radical nephrectomy for 152 Chinese patients with large renal cell carcinoma in clinical stage cT2 or cT3a: A long-term retrospective comparison. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2016;12(2):805–810. 37. Kadyrov Z.A., Odilov A.Yu., Yagudaev D.M. Comparative analysis of intra- and postoperative complications of retroperitoneoscopic and laparoscopic nephrectomy for large tumors. Onkourolohyya. 2018;14(4):22–28. Russain (Кадыров З.А., Одилов А.Ю., Ягудаев Д.М. Сравнительный анализ интра- и послеоперационных осложнений ретроперитонеоскопической и лапароскопической нефрэктомии при опухолях больших размеров. Онкоурология. 2018;14(4):22–28). 38. Matveev V.B., Komarov Y.H., Volkova M.Y., Skvorcov Y.Ya., Komarov M.Y., Chernyaev V.A. y dr. Safety and expediency of use of transperitonealny laparoscopic access for performance of a radical nefrektomiya at clinically localized kidney cancer. Onkourolohyya. 2013;9(4):14–21. Russian (Матвеев В.Б., Комаров И.Г., Волкова М.И., Скворцов И.Я., Комаров М.И., Черняев В.А. и др. Безопасность и целесообразность использования трансперитонеального лапароскопического доступа для выполнения радикальной нефрэктомии при клинически локализованном раке почки. Онкоурология. 2013;9(4):14–21). 39. Hajhamad M.M., Rajan R., Mahmood N.R., Bahadzor B. Transmesenteric small bowel herniation causing intestinal obstruction following laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy. Formosan J. Surgery. 2016;49(4):161–164. 40. Bravo-Castroa E.I., Campos-Salcedo J.G., Sedano-Lozano A., Torres-Salazar J.J., Torres-Gómez J.J., Castelán-Martínez J.A. et al. Reparación laparoscópica de una lesión de vena cava producida por una engrapadora durante una nefrectomía laparoscópica. Rev Mex. Urol. 2014;74(3):190–192. 41. Bozkurt M., Can O., Altunrende F. A Pancreatic Fistula as a Rare Complication of Laparascopic Radical Nephrectomy: A Case Report. Urol. Case Rep. 2017;12:20–22. 42. Malhotra M.K., Malhotra S. Delayed pancreatic fistula-rare complication of left nephrectomy. Bangladesh J. Med. Sci. 2016;15(3):483–484. 43. Jairath A., Singh A., Ganpule A., Mishra S., Sabnis R., Desai M. Management Protocol for Chylous Ascites After Laparoscopic Nephrectomy. Urology. 2015;86(3):521–528. 44. Hsiao C.H., Yu C.C., Hsieh T.Y., Kao Y.L., Wang S.C. Chen W.J. et al. Chylous ascites as a complication of nephroureterectomy. Urological Science. 2015;26:139–141. 45. Ter Meulen S., van Donselaar-van der Pant K.A., Bemelman F.J., Idu M.M. Chylous ascites after laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy: Is it specific for the left-side? Urol. Ann. 2013;5(1):45–46. 46. Shirodkar S.P., Gorin M.A., Sageshima J., Bird V.G., Martinez J.M., Zarak A.et al. Technical modification for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy to minimize testicular pain: A complication with significant morbidity. Am. J. Transplant. 2011;11(5):1031–1034. 47. Sureka S.K., Srivastava A., Agarwal S., Srivastava A., Sachin A.N., Singh S.et al. Prevention of Orchialgia After Left-Sided Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy – A Prospective Study. J. Endourol. 2015;29(6):696–699. 48. Srivastava A., Kapoor R., Srivastava A., Ansari M.S., Singh M., Kapoor R.Orchialgia after laparoscopic renal surgery: a common problem with questionable etiology. Are there any predictors? World J. Urol. 2013;31(5):1153–1157. 49. Bhattu A.S., Ganpule A., Sabnis R.B., Murali V., Mishra S., Desai M. Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy vs Standard Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study. J. Endourol. 2015;29(12):1334–1340. 50. Pradere B., Benoit T., Peyronnet B., May A., Beauval J.B., Roumiguié M.et al. Living donor nephrectomy: A multicentric comparative study between standard laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Eur. Urol. Suppl. 2016;15(3):e85. 51. Perkins S.Q., Giffen Z.C., Buck B.J., Ortiz J., Sindhwani P., Ekwenna O. Initial Experience with the Use of a Robotic Stapler for Robot-Assisted Donor Nephrectomy. J. Endourol. 2018;32(11):1054–1057. 52. Monn M.F., Gramm A.R., Bahler C.D., Yang D.Y., Sundaram C.P. Economic and utilization analysis of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J. Endourol. 2014;28(7):780–783. 53. Creta M., Calogero A., Sagnelli C., Peluso G., Incollingo P., Candida M.et al. Donor and Recipient Outcomes following Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review. Biomed Res Int. 2019 Apr 22;2019:1729138. Doi: 10.1155/2019/1729138. 54. Klap J., Cholley I., Masson-Lecomte A., Defontaines J., Vordos D., Hoznek A. et al. 1000 retroperitoneoscopic procedures of the upper urinary tract: Analysis of complications. Eur. Urol. Suppl. 2017;16(3):e2027. 55. Fan X., Lin T., Xu K., Yin Z., Huang H., Dong W. et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur. Urol. 2012;62(4):601–612. 56. Pierorazio P.M., Hyams E.S., Lin B.M., Mullins J.K., Allaf M.E. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large renal masses: critical assessment of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of stage T2a and T2b tumors. Urology. 2012;79(3):570–575. 57. Matveev V.B., Komarov Y.H., Volkova M.Y., Romashenko N.N. Comparative analysis of the results of laparoscopic and open nephrectomy for tumors of the renal parenchyma. Onkourolohyya. 2007;3:10–15. Russian (Матвеев В.Б., Волкова М.И., Комаров И.Г., Ромащенко Н.Н. Сравнительный анализ результатов лапароскопической и открытой нефрэктомии при опухолях почечной паренхимы.Онкоурология. 2007;3:10–15). 58. Kadyrov Z.A. Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoskopic operations in urology. M.: «HЭOTAR-Medya, 2017; 488 s. Russian (Кадыров З.А. Лапароскопические и ретроперитонеоскопические операции в урологии. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2017; 488 с). 59. Mitropoulos D., Artibani W., Graefen M., Remzi M., Rouprêt M., Truss M. Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur. Urol. 2012;61(2):341–349. 60. Yoon P.D., Chalasani V., Woo H.H. Use of Clavien-Dindo classification in reporting and grading complications after urological surgical procedures: analysis of 2010 to 2012. J. Urol. 2013;190(4):1271–1274. 61. Khan A., Palit V., Myatt A., Cartledge J.J., Browning A.J., Joyce A.D. et al. Assessment of Clavien-Dindo classification in patients > 75 years undergoing nephrectomy / nephroureterectomy. Urol. Ann. 2013;5(1):18–22. 62. Xu B., Hu J., Chen A., Hao Y., Liu G., Wang C. et al. Risk Factors Related with Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Converted to Open Nephrectomy for Nonfunctioning Renal Tuberculosis. J. Endourol. 2017;31(6):588–592. 63. Jordan B.J., Matulewicz R.S., Trihn B., Kundu S. Venous thromboembolism after nephrectomy: incidence, timing and associated risk factors from a national multi-institutional database. World J. Urol. 2017;35(11):1713–1719.
А в т о р д л я с в я з и: З. А. Кадыров – д.м.н., профессор, заведующий кафедрой эндоскопической урологии факультета непрерывного медицинского образования медицинского института ФГАОУ ВО «Российский университет дружбы народов», Москва, Россия, е-mail: zieratsho@yandex.ru