Осложнения гибкой урете-рореноскопии: систематический обзор литературы


DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/urology.2024.2.105-111

Малхасян В.А., Мартов А.Г., Гаджиев Н.К., Сухих С.О., Григорян Б.Л., Пушкарь Д.Ю.

1) ФГБОУ ВО «Российский Университет Медицины» Минздрава России, Москва, Россия; 2) ГБУЗ «Городская клиническая больница им. С. П. Боткина» Департамента здравоохранения города Москвы, Москва, Россия; 3) ФГБУ ГНЦ «Федеральный медицинский биофизический центр им. А. И. Бурназяна» ФМБА, Москва, Россия; 4) Медицинский научно-образовательный центр МГУ им. М. В. Ломоносова, Москва, Россия; 5) Клиника высоких медицинских технологий им. Н. И. Пирогова Санкт-Петербургского государственного университета, Санкт-Петербург, Россия
Стандартная гибкая уретерореноскопия (УРС) – метод осмотра верхних мочевыводящих путей, осуществляемый с использованием гибкого фибро- или цифрового эндоскопа трансуретральным доступом через естественные мочевыводящие пути. Чаще всего метод применяется для контактной эндоскопической дезинтеграции камней почки. Согласно национальным клиническим рекомендациям, гибкая УРС является методом выбора лечения пациентов с мочекаменной болезнью при размерах конкремента до 20 мм. Однако, как и любое другое оперативное вмешательство, гибкая УРС связана с риском развития осложнений. Осложнения влияют на качество жизни пациентов и являются причиной дополнительных затрат, связанных с пребыванием пациента в стационаре и последующим лечением. Данный систематический обзор посвящен осложнениям гибкой УРС, методам предвидения их профилактики и лечения, что должно позволять повышать эффективность и безопасность оказания помощи данной категории больных.

Литература


1. Gadzhiev N., Prosyannikov M., Malkhasyan V., Akopyan G., Somani B., Sivkov A., et al. Urolithiasis prevalence in the Russian Federation: analysis of trends over a 15-year period. World J Urol. 2021;39(10):3939-3944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03729-y.


2. Danilovic A., Torricelli F., Marchini G.S., Batagello C., Vicentini F.C., Traxer O., et al. Residual stone fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: shockwave lithotripsy vs. retrograde intrarenal surgery. 2020. Journal of Endourology. 2021;35(5):609-614. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0868.


3. Geraghty R., Abourmarzouk O., Rai B., Biyani C.S., Rukin N.J., Somani B.K. Evidence for Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Fragmentation (URSL) for Large Renal Stones in the Modern Era. Curr Urol Rep. 2015;16(8):54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-015-0529-3


4. de la Rosette J., Denstedt J., Geavlete P., Keeley F., Matsuda T., Pearle M., et al. The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol. 2014;28(2):131-139. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0436


5. Gauhar V., Chew B.H., Traxer O., Tailly T., Emiliani E., Inoue T., et al. Indications, preferences, global practice patterns and outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones in adults: results from a multicenter database of 6669 patients of the global FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR). World J Urol. 2023;41(2):567-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04257-z


6. Bolliger M., Kroehnert J.A., Molineus F., Kandioler D., Schindl M., Riss P. Experiences with the standardized classification of surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo) in general surgery patients. Eur Surg. 2018;50(6):256-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-018-0551-z


7. Mandal S., Goel A., Singh M.K., Kathpalia R., Nagathan D.S., Sankhwar S.N., et al. Clavien classification of semirigid ureteroscopy complications: a prospective study. Urology. 2012;80(5):995-1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.05.047


8. Öğreden E., Oğuz U., Demirelli E., Benli E., Sancak E.B., Gülpinar M.T., et al. Categorization of ureteroscopy complications and investigation of associated factors by using the modified Clavien classification system. Turk J Med Sci. 2016;46(3):686-694. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1503-9


9. Cindolo L., Castellan P., Scoffone C.M., Cracco C.M., Celia A., Paccaduscio A., et al. Mortality and flexible ureteroscopy: analysis of six cases. World J Urol. 2016;34(3):305-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1642-0


10. Demir D.O., Doluoglu O.G., Yildiz Y., Bozkurt S., Ayyildiz A., Demirbas A. Risk Factors for Infectious Complications in Patients Undergoing Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019;29(6):558-562. https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2019.06.558


11. Berardinelli F., De Francesco P., Marchioni M., Cera N., Proietti S., Hennessey D., et al. Infective complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery: a new standardized classification system. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48(11):1757-1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1373-1.


12. Fan S., Gong B., Hao Z., Zhang L., Zhou J., Zhang Y., et al. Risk factors of infectious complications following flexible ureteroscope with a holmium laser: a retrospective study. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(7):11252-9.


13. Dybowski B., Bres-Niewada E., Rzeszutko M., Tkaczyk A., Woźniak B., Wójcik M., et al. Risk factors for infectious complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery – a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(3):437-445. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2021.250


14. Li T., Sun X.Z., Lai D.H., Li X., He YZ. Fever and systemic inflammatory response syndrome after retrograde intrarenal surgery: Risk factors and predictive model. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018;34(7):400-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.002


15. Senocak C., Ozcan C., Sahin T., Yilmaz G., Ozyuvali E., Sarikaya S., et al. Risk Factors of Infectious Complications after Flexible Uretero-renoscopy with Laser Lithotripsy. Urol J. 2018;15(4):158-163. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v0i0.3967


16. Mi Q., Meng X., Meng L., Chen D., Fang S. Risk Factors for Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Induced by Flexible Ureteroscope Combined with Holmium Laser Lithotripsy. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:6842479. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6842479


17. Baseskioglu B. The Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infection Following Flexible Ureterenoscopy and the Associated Risk Factors. Urol J. 2019;16(5):439-442. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v0i0.4340


18. Ma Y.C., Jian Z.Y., Yuan C., Li H., Wang K.J. Risk Factors of Infectious Complications after Ureteroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on Adjusted Effect Estimate. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020;21(10):811-822. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2020.013


19. Baboudjian M., Gondran-Tellier B., Abdallah R., Sichez P.C., Akiki A., Gaillet S., et al. Predictive risk factors of urinary tract infection following flexible ureteroscopy despite preoperative precautions to avoid infectious complications. World J Urol. 2020;38(5):1253-1259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02891-8


20. Bhojani N., Miller L.E., Bhattacharyya S., Cutone B., Chew B.H. Risk Factors for Urosepsis After Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2021;35(7):991-1000. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.1133


21. Wang F., Hong Y., Yang Z., Ye L. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of stones at ureteropelvic junction with high-grade hydronephrosis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):14050. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93551-8


22. Corrales M., Sierra A., Doizi S., Traxer O. Risk of Sepsis in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022;44:84-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.08.008


23. Zhong W., Leto G., Wang L., Zeng G. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a study of risk factors. J Endourol. 2015;29(1):25-28. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0409


24. Loftus C.J., Hinck B., Makovey I., Sivalingam S., Monga M. Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: The Impact of Sheath Size on Intrarenal Pelvic Pressure and Infectious Complications in a Porcine Model. J Endourol. 2018;32(4):350-353. https://doi.org/ 10.1089/end.2017.0602


25. Omar M., Noble M., Sivalingam S., El Mahdy A., Gamal A., Farag M., et al. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Single-Blind Clinical Trial Evaluating the Impact of Irrigation Pressure. J Urol. 2016;196(1):109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.104


26. Tokas T., Skolarikos A., Herrmann TR.W., Nagele U.; Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group. Pressure matters 2: intrarenal pressure ranges during upper-tract endourological procedures. World J Urol. 2019;37(1):133-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2379-3.


27. Jung H., Osther P.J. Intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible ureterorenoscopy. Springerplus. 2015;4:373. Doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1114-4.


28. Kottooran C., Twum-Ampofo J., Lee J., Saunders J., Franco M., Budrewicz J., et al. Evaluation of fluid absorption during flexible ureteroscopy in an in vivo porcine model. BJU Int. 2023;131(2):213-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15858


29. Sener T.E., Cloutier J., Villa L., Marson F., Butticè S., Doizi S., et al. Can We Provide Low Intrarenal Pressures with Good Irrigation Flow by Decreasing the Size of Ureteral Access Sheaths? J Endourol. 2016;30(1):49-55. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0387


30. Wright A., Williams K., Somani B., Rukin N. Intrarenal pressure and irrigation flow with commonly used ureteric access sheaths and instruments. Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(4):434-438. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.604.


31. Auge B.K., Pietrow P.K., Lallas C.D., Raj G.V., Santa-Cruz R.W., Preminger G.M. Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Endourol. 2004;18(1):33-36. https://doi.org/10.1089/089277904322836631.


32. Rehman J., Monga M., Landman J., Lee D.I., Felfela T., Conradie M.C., et al. Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths. Urology. 2003;61(4):713-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02440-8


33. Chen Y., Liao B., Feng S., Ye D., Zeng G., Wang K., et al. Comparison of Safety and Efficacy in Preventing Postoperative Infectious Complications of a 14/16F Ureteral Access Sheath with a 12/14F Ureteral Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2018;32(10):923-927. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0222


34. Traxer O., Wendt-Nordahl G., Sodha H., Rassweiler J., Meretyk S., Tefekli A., et al. Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. World J Urol. 2015;33(12):2137-2144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1582-8.


35. Xu Y., Min Z., Wan S.P., Nie H., Duan G. Complications of retrograde intrarenal surgery classified by the modified Clavien grading system. Urolithiasis. 2018;46(2):197-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-0961-6


36. Nevo A., Mano R., Baniel J., Lifshitz D.A. Ureteric stent dwelling time: a risk factor for post-ureteroscopy sepsis. BJU Int. 2017;120(1):117-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13796


37. Geraghty R.M., Pietropaolo A., Villa L., Fitzpatrick J., Shaw M., Veeratterapillay R., et al. Post-Ureteroscopy Infections Are Linked to Pre-Operative Stent Dwell Time over Two Months: Outcomes of Three European Endourology Centres. J Clin Med. 2022;11(2):310. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/jcm11020310


38. Castellani D., Teoh J.Y., Pavia M.P., Pretore E., Dell’Atti L., Galosi A.B., et al. Assessing the Optimal Urine Culture for Predicting Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2022;36(2):158-168. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0386


39. Geraghty R.M., Pietropaolo A., Villa L., Fitzpatrick J., Shaw M., Veeratterapillay R., et al. Post-Ureteroscopy Infections Are Linked to Pre-Operative Stent Dwell Time over Two Months: Outcomes of Three European Endourology Centres. J Clin Med. 2022;11(2):310. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020310


40. Nevo A., Mano R., Baniel J., Lifshitz D.A. Ureteric stent dwelling time: a risk factor for post-ureteroscopy sepsis. BJU Int. 2017l;120(1):117-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13796


41. Deng T., Liu B., Duan X., Cai C., Zhao Z., Zhu W., et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. BJU Int. 2018;122(1):29-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14101.


42. Khusid J.A., Hordines J.C., Sadiq A.S., Atallah W.M., Gupta M. Prevention and Management of Infectious Complications of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. Front Surg. 2021;8:718583. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fsurg.2021.718583


43. Zisman A., Badaan S., Kastin A., Kravtsov A., Amiel G.E., Mullerad M. Tailoring Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Ureteroscopic Procedures Based on Local Resistance Profiles May Lead to Reduced Rates of Infections and Urosepsis. Urol Int. 2020;104(1-2):106-112. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503905


44. Chiu P.K., Chan C.K., Ma W.K., To K.C., Cheung F.K., Yiu M.K. Subcapsular hematoma after ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2013;27(9):1115-1119. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0128


45. Bai J., Li C., Wang S., Liu J., Ye Z., Yu X., et al. Subcapsular renal haematoma after holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser ureterolithotripsy. BJU Int. 2012;109(8):1230-1234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10490.x


46. Nazer A., Awwad A.A., Aljuhayman A., Alasker A., Bin Hamri S. Stone fragments migration into subcapsular renal hematoma post flexible ureterorenoscopy (unique presentation). J Surg Case Rep. 2019;2019(5):rjz125. https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjz125


47. Whitehurst L.A., Somani B.K. Perirenal Hematoma After Ureteroscopy: A Systematic Review. J Endourol. 2017;31(5):438-445. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0832


48. Kao M-H., Wang C-C. Risk factors for developing a perirenal hematoma after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Urological Science. 2016;27(3):166–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urols.2015.09.003


49. Lee M.S., Connors B.A., Agarwal D.K., Assmus M.A., Williams J.C.. Jr, Large T., et al. Determining the threshold of acute renal parenchymal damage for intrarenal pressure during flexible ureteroscopy using an in vivo pig model. World J Urol. 2022;40(11):2675-2681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04154-5


50. Delvecchio F.C., Auge B.K., Brizuela R.M., Weizer A.Z., Silverstein A.D., Lallas C.D., et al. Assessment of stricture formation with the ureteral access sheath. Urology. 2003;61(3):518-522; discussion 522. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02433-0.


51. Traxer O., Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol. 2013;189(2):580-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.197


52. Jessen J.P., Breda A., Brehmer M., Liatsikos E.N., Millan Rodriguez F., et al. International Collaboration in Endourology: Multicenter Evaluation of Prestenting for Ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol. 2016;30(3):268-273. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0109


53. Sung L.H., Cho D.Y. The role of preoperative ureteral stenting in retrograde intrarenal surgery in renal stone patients: a propensity score-matched study. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(2):276-283. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.03.09


54. Stern K.L., Loftus C.J., Doizi S., Traxer O., Monga M. A Prospective Study Analyzing the Association Between High-grade Ureteral Access Sheath Injuries and the Formation of Ureteral Strictures. Urology. 2019;128:38-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.02.032


55. Aykanat C., Balci M., Senel C., Ozercan A.Y., Coser S., Aslan Y., et al. The Impact of Ureteral Access Sheath Size on Perioperative Parameters and Postoperative Ureteral Stricture in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. J Endourol. 2022;36(8):1013-1017. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0751


56. Chang X., Wang Y., Li J., Han Z. Prestenting Versus Nonprestenting on the Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy for Large Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2021;105(7-8):560-567. https://doi.org/10.1159/000506652


57. Fahmy O., Shsm H., Lee C., Khairul-Asri M.G. Impact of Preoperative Stenting on the Outcome of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Upper Urinary Tract Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2022;106(7):679-687. https://doi.org/10.1159/000518160


58. Law Y.X.T., Teoh J.Y.C., Castellani D., Lim E.J., Chan E.O.T., Wroclawski M., et al. Role of pre-operative ureteral stent on outcomes of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS): systematic review and meta-analysis of 3831 patients and comparison of Asian and non-Asian cohorts. World J Urol. 2022;40(6):1377-1389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03935-2


59. Lim K.S., Lim Y.W., Yong D.Z.P., Hao Y., Ho H.S.S., Ng L.G., et al. Two Weeks Too Long: Optimal Duration for Ureteral Prestenting and Its Physiologic Effects on the Ureter in a Yorkshire-Landrace Pig Model. J Endourol. 2019;33(4):325-330. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0872


Об авторах / Для корреспонденции


А в т о р д л я с в я з и: В. А. Малхасян – д.м.н., профессор кафедры урологии ФГБОУ ВО «РосУниМед», заведующий урологическим отделением № 67, ГКБ им. С. П. Боткина ДЗМ, Москва, Россия; e-mail: vigenmalkhasyan@gmail.com


Похожие статьи


Бионика Медиа